Nucleus → atom → material

The rotating construction

Drag to orbit the model, wheel to zoom. The walkthrough keeps established equations, arithmetic identities, working hypotheses and open mechanisms visually distinct.

Visual nuclear layer placement and electron-gap shapes are hypotheses, not measured reconstructions. Atomic and nuclear scales are logarithmically compressed so both remain visible.

Model controls

Rotation speed1.0×

Layer separation1.0×

Wake / alignment control65%

Material comparison

Direct structural chain

Proton rotor
DERIVED (p,q)=(2,3), W=3 movement partition

Traction mismatch
DERIVED T=3(W+1)=12

Nuclear→atomic ratio
IDENTITY 1.03443×10⁸

Electron forced gap
HYPOTHESIS π vs 2π contact-frame recurrence

Orbital levels
IDENTITY rₙ=n²a₀, ωₙ∝n⁻³

Next-phase electron options

Mismatch seed: one short/long contact-side pair; require a collective threshold before persistence.
π versus 2π: test director inversion and directed-frame recurrence as separate sectors.
Trapped zipper: bend the selected pressure rift into circulation at an independently sourced boundary.
Gap kink: render the opening, leading hand-off and trailing pinch separately; do not impose a helix.
Tidal lock: retain the exact spin/orbit rim-speed identity, then test physical re-locking transients.
Length change: keep as a competing diagnostic only; the downloaded rod-contraction account conflicts with the current point-electron canon and is not promoted.